Research can be quite laborious, especially if you’re not
intimately familiar with the field. In order to see what has been said about a
subject, you must track down and read as many papers as you can find. To do it
comprehensively, you will inevitably read many irrelevant papers. In actuality,
the difficulties in doing this mean that many papers never get read, and their
contributions are largely forgotten or reintroduced at a later time.
Abstract summaries of work in a field, such as that provide
by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, can be quite helpful to get a
start. But while they provide a new researcher with the lay of the land, they
only cover topics at a fairly abstract level. They don’t aim to provide a comprehensive
guide to work on the subject.
There is a reason why this is so. Encyclopedia entries have a history as printed
books, and entries in printed books are constrained by space and to a linear
presentation. One of the great things about Wikipedia is that it helps remove
both of these constraints. A Wikipedia article may provide links to other
articles that elaborate on ideas in the present article, so that the reader may
get as much details as he or she wants. And Wikipedia contains vastly more
information than the average encyclopedia.
Contemporary scholarship has gotten a huge boost from internet
resources. I never had to do serious research without the help of Google
scholar. That, together with Philpapers, has been immensely helpful. The
internet can provide resources that make research much easier. One resource which
is not presently available, but which would be immensely useful, would be a comprehensive
database of brief summaries of the contributions made by academic papers on a
given issue, organized in a way that makes it easy to see the main trends of
research and how each paper fits in with those trends.
To this end, I have created a Wikipedia-style resource for the Sleeping Beauty problem at sleepingbeautyproblem.org. The aim of this project is provide a short summary of every paper written on the subject as an experiment in what such a resource might provide.
For the Sleeping Beauty problem, this is rather manageable,
as there are a relatively small number of papers. Even still, it’s a high
enough number that it is worthwhile to have such a resource. I suspect that
many researchers in the area are familiar with the general trends, but few have
read every last paper on the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment